Legitimacy in Internal Conflict: Insurgency and Counterinsurgency

Authors

  • Hira Lal Joshi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/shivapuri.v25i1.63430

Keywords:

Bottom-up approach, Counterinsurgency, Legitimacy, Insurgency, Internal armed conflict, Mobilization

Abstract

Max Weber's (the Weberian) concept of legitimacy is the most applied form of legitimacy but lacks the concept to address the contemporary complex issues that are prevalent in today's unconventional conflicts. Legitimacy is neither state-centric nor top-down alone. It is dynamic and may shift from one group to the other in the contested security environment and, take the bottom-up approach. The 'Western' Counterinsurgency undermines the power of the insurgents who would build their legitimacy to advance their cause. This is mainly because the 'Western' view of state formation dominates discussions on legitimacy. Insurgents and counterinsurgents both compete for legitimacy at the local level, to win over the belief and trust of the people that primarily give the legitimacy the shape of bottom-up.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
122
PDF
99

Downloads

Published

2024-03-03

How to Cite

Joshi, H. L. (2024). Legitimacy in Internal Conflict: Insurgency and Counterinsurgency. The Shivapuri Journal, 25(1), 32–46. https://doi.org/10.3126/shivapuri.v25i1.63430

Issue

Section

Articles