L2 Vocabulary Learning and Testing: Student Proficiency and the Use of L1 Translations versus L2 Definitions

Authors

  • Paul Joyce Kindai University in Osaka,

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/nelta.v21i1-2.20205

Keywords:

L2 vocabulary, L1 translation, Testing, Intentional learning, Proficiency

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between student proficiency and the use of first language (L1) translations versus second language (L2) definitions in the learning and testing of L2 vocabulary. For this study, 48 Japanese L2 learners of English studied 200 lexical items from the Academic Word List over a ten-week period. The language in which the meaning of the target vocabulary was presented and tested was manipulated such that the learners were given half in their L1 and half in their L2. The results showed that the low proficiency group learnt significantly more vocabulary than the high group. However, while student proficiency did not interact with study language, it was significantly related to testing language. That is, both overall and over time, the higher ability learners did relatively significantly better on the L2 definition tests and worse on the L1 translation tests, and vice-versa.

 Journal of NELTA, Vol. 21, No. 1-2, 2016, Page: 93-104

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
874
PDF
656

Author Biography

Paul Joyce, Kindai University in Osaka,

Associate Professor 

Downloads

Published

2016-12-01

How to Cite

Joyce, P. (2016). L2 Vocabulary Learning and Testing: Student Proficiency and the Use of L1 Translations versus L2 Definitions. Journal of NELTA, 21(1-2), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.3126/nelta.v21i1-2.20205

Issue

Section

Articles