Time to Review and Revise the Peer Review Process: A Critique

Authors

  • Pawan Sharma Patan Academy of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Lalitpur, Nepal
  • Swarndeep Singh All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India
  • Yatan Pal Singh Balhara All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India
  • Sandip Subedi Universal College of Medical Sciences and Teaching Hospital, Bhairahawa, Nepal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/jpan.v10i2.49006

Keywords:

Peer-review, retraction, scientific publishing, biomedical ethics

Abstract

Biomedical publishing is valuable as it is the process of disseminating novel and valuable scientific information. The publication of an article relies mainly on the peer review process that has been regarded as a gold standard for a long time. Despite being successful, the process has had a fair share of criticism. There is a need for considering some reforms in terms of transparency, accountability, and quality for this process. In this review, we aim to bring forward some criticism and provide recommendations for improvement of the peer-review process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
65
PDF
102
Cover JPAN

Downloads

Published

2021-12-31

How to Cite

Sharma, P., Singh, S., Balhara, Y. P. S., & Subedi, S. (2021). Time to Review and Revise the Peer Review Process: A Critique. Journal of Psychiatrists' Association of Nepal, 10(2), 43–45. https://doi.org/10.3126/jpan.v10i2.49006

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 2 (2021)

Section

Review Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Psychiatrists' Association of Nepal

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use.