Outcome of external fixator in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients with co-morbidities

Authors

  • Deepak Kumar Dutta National Academy of Medical Sciences, Bir Hosppital, Kathmandu, Nepal
  • R, Sinha National Academy of Medical Sciences, Bir Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/jmcjms.v7i1.29918

Keywords:

comorbidity, elderly, external fixator, intertrochanteric fracture, Harris Hip Score

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Incidence of intertrochanteric fracture is rising because of increasing number of elderly. They tend to have many comorbidities of different systems; therefore, major surgeries are not possible at times. In these patients, external fixator can be an option as it promotes early ambulation, thereby preventing recumbency-associated complications.

Material and Methods: Elderly patients of interetrochanteric fracture and with medical comorbidities were managed with external fixator. Functional outcome was measured by Harris Hip Score (HHS) on first post-operative day and in follow ups on 4, 12, and 24 weeks.

Results: Thrity patients (19 males, 11 females), of mean age 77.63 years (SD=9.06) were studied. HHS scores steadily increased from 37.6±5.28 on the first post-operative dayto 49.43±6.9 on 4 weeks, 59.83±7.17 on 12 weeks, and 72.47±4.17 on 24 weeks. The changes were all very highly significant (all p=0.000). Mean time taken to union was 14.67±2.28 weeks. None of the patients had recumbency-related complications.

Conclusion: External fixators for intertrochanteric fractures in medically comorbid elderly patientsis effective in promoting ambulation and preventing recumbency-related complications.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
280
PDF
296

Author Biographies

Deepak Kumar Dutta, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Bir Hosppital, Kathmandu, Nepal

Department of Orthopedics

R, Sinha, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Bir Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal

Department of Orthopaedics

References

1. Kulkarni GS, Limaye R, Kulkarni M, Kulkarni S. Intertrochanteric fractures. Indian J Orthop 2006;40:16-23.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.34069
2. Koval KJ, Zuckerman JD. Functional recovery after fracture of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994;76:751-8.
https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199405000-00018
3. Laskin RS, Gruber MA, Zimmerman AJ. Intertrochantric fractures of the hip in the elderly: aretrospective analysis of 236 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res1979; 141:188-195.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-197906000-00024
4. Pillar T, Gasper E, Poplingher AR, Dickstein R. Operated versus non-operated hip fractures in a geriatric rehabilitation hospital. IntDisabil Stud 1988;10(3):104-6.
https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288809164124
5. Gottfried Y, Frish E, Mendes DG. Roffman M. Intertrochanteric fractures in high risk geriatric patients treated by external fixation. Orthopedics 1985; 8(6):769-74.
6. Kenzora JE., McCarthy RE., Lowell JD., Sledge CB. Hip fracture mortality: relation to age, treatment, preoperative illness, time of surgery and complications. Clin Orthop 1984; 186:45-56.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-198406000-00008
7. Tomak Y, Kocaoglu M, Piskin A, Yildiz C, Gulman B, Tomak L. Treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in geriatric patients with a modified external fixator. Injury. 2005;36:635-643. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2004.10.013
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2004.10.013
8. Subasi M, Kesemenli C, Kapukaya A, Necmioglu S. Treatment of intertrochanteric fractures by external fixation. Acta Orthop Belg 2001; 67(5):468-74.
9. American Society of Anesthesiologists. ASA Physical Status Classification System. 2014.
10. Nilsdotter A, Bremander A. Measures of hip function and symptoms. Arthritis Care and Research 2011; 63(S11): S200-S207
https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20549
11. Sonawane DV. Classifications of intertrochanteric fractures and their clinical importance. Trauma International 2015; 1(1):7-11
12. Gani NU, Kangoo KA, Bashir A, et al. External fixation of "intertrochanteric" fractures. Orthopedic Reviews 2009; 1:e18.
https://doi.org/10.4081/or.2009.e18
13. Karn NK, Singh GK, Kumar P, Shrestha B, Singh MP, Gowda MJ. Comparison between external fixation and sliding hip screw in the management of trochanteric fracture of the femur in Nepal. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;88(10):1347-50. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B10.18023
https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.88B10.18023
14. Ozkaya U, Parmaksizoglu AS, Gul M, Kabukcuoglu Y, Ozkazanli G, Basilgan S. Management of osteoporotic pertrochanteric fractures with external fixation in elderly patients. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2008;42(4):246-251.
https://doi.org/10.3944/AOTT.2008.246
15. Aly TA, Hafez K, El-nor TA, Amin O. Treatment of trochanteric fractures by external fixator in patients with high unacceptable operative risk. Pan Arab J Orth Trauma 2004;8:157-162.
16. Kazakos K, Lyras DN, Verettas D, Galanis V, Psillakis I, Xarchas K. External fixation of intertrochanteric fractures in elderly high-risk patients; Acta Orthop Belg 2007;73(1):44-48.
17. Moroni A, Faldini C, Pegreffi F, Hoang-Kim A, Vannini F, Giannini S. Dynamic hip screw compared with external fixation for treatment of osteoporotic pertrochanteric fractures. A prospective, randomized study. JBone Joint Surg Am 2005;87(4):753-9.
https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200504000-00009

Downloads

Published

2019-12-31

How to Cite

Dutta, D. K., & Sinha, R. (2019). Outcome of external fixator in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients with co-morbidities. Janaki Medical College Journal of Medical Science, 7(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.3126/jmcjms.v7i1.29918

Issue

Section

Research Articles