Impact of silviculture system on regeneration status and species diversity: reflection from far-western lowland, Nepal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3126/banko.v33i2.58280Keywords:
Important value index, silviculture system, Shorea robusta, species diversity, Sustainable forest managmentAbstract
Adoption of silvicultural system aims to enhance the regeneration of desired species. Irregular shelterwood system was initiated in Shorea robusta dominated forest under different forest management regimes including community forest in lowland forest of Nepal. The present study was conducted in 2023 to compare the regeneration status and species diversity between the two different management practices (scientific forest management and conventional forest management) in Patela Community Forest in far-western lowland of Nepal. A total of 27 quadrat sample plots (each with 4 m2) were established at a spacing of 50 m x 50 m across the three scientifically managed blocks, each with an area of 2.14 ha. An equal number of sample plots (27) were established within the conventionally managed blocks. Important Value Index, Sorenson’s Similarity Indices, and the distribution patterns of each species were calculated in both the management blocks to compare the species diversity. Shapiro-Wilk test was performed to check the normality of regeneration count, and a two-sample t-test was employed to examine the significant differences in the mean count of the plant species. The present study revealed that the conventionally managed forest block has higher species diversity; however, the number of seedlings was significantly high in the scientifically managed forest blocks. The Important Value Index Analysis indicated that S. robusta was dominant tree species in both the management blocks followed by Terminalia tomentosa; however, there was higher number of S. robusta regeneration under the scientifically managed blocks. The study concludes that irregular shelter-wood system is effective for regulating S. robusta forests in the western lowlands of Nepal.
Downloads
References
Awasthi, N., Aryal, K., Chhetri, B. B. K., Bhandari, S. K., Khanal, Y., Gotame, P., & Baral, K. (2020). Reflecting on species diversity and regeneration dynamics of scientific forest management practices in Nepal. Forest Ecology and Management, 474, 118378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118378
Awasthi, N., Bhandari, S. K., & Khanal, Y. (2015). Does scientific forest management promote plant species diversity and regeneration in Sal (Shorea robusta) forest? A case study from Lumbini collaborative forest, Rupandehi, Nepal. Banko Janakari, 25(1), 20-29. https://doi.org/10.3126/banko.v25i1.13468
Baral, S., Gautam, A. P., & Vacik, H. (2018). Ecological and economical sustainability assessment of community forest management in Nepal: A reality check. Journal of sustainable forestry, 37(8), 820-841. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2018.1490188
Bhusal, P., Awasthi, K. R., & Kimengsi, J. N. (2020). User’s opinion in scientific forest management implementation in Nepal–a case study from Nawalparasi district. Cogent environmental science, 6(1), 1778987. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311843.2020.1778987
DoF. (2023). About Us. https://www.dofsc.gov.np/ Acessed on Febrauary 27, 2023.
Friedel, A., v. Oheimb, G., Dengler, J., & Härdtle, W. (2006). Species diversity and species composition of epiphytic bryophytes and lichens–a comparison of managed and unmanaged beech forests in NE Germany. Feddes Repertorium: Zeitschrift für botanische Taxomonie und Geobotanik, 117(1‐2), 172-185. https://doi.org/10.1002/fedr.200511084
GON. (2014). Scientific forest management guideline. Department of forests. Government of Nepal.
Kent, M. (2011). Vegetation description and data analysis: a practical approach. John Wiley & Sons.
Khadka, P., Ayer, K., & Miya, M. S. (2023). Effect of irregular shelter wood system-based scientific forest management on tree species distribution, diversity, and regeneration in Shorea robusta (Sal) forest of Kailali district, Nepal. Ceylon Journal of Science, 52(1), 23-31.
Kharel, R., Acharya, K. R., & Gautam, A. (2021). Regeneration status and diversity under irregular shelterwood system: A study from Panchkanya Community Forest, Sunsari, Nepal. Forestry: Journal of Institute of Forestry, Nepal, 18(01), 41-51. https://doi.org/10.3126/forestry.v18i01.41751
Khatri, B., Gautam, D., Gaire, D., Khanal, Y., Bhattarai, S., & Khatri, S. K. (2021). Species Diversity and Regeneration under the Scientific Forest Management Practice in Tropical Region of Nepal. Agriculture and Forestry Journal, 5(2), 89-95.
Khatri, D.B., Gotame B. and Bishwokarma, D. (2015). Harmonizing Science and Democracy: Review of Recent Initiative of Nepal’s Forest Department on Forest Management. Forest Action Nepal, Multi Stakeholder Forestry Programme, Satdobato, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Kubsa, A., & Tadesse, T. (2002). Granting exclusive user rights to the forest dwellers in the state owned forest: The WAJIB approach in Ethiopia. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Participatory Forestry in Africa, Arusha, Tanzania (pp. 18-22).
Luna-Bautista, L., Hernández-de la Rosa, P., Velázquez-Martínez, A., Gómez-Guerrero, A., & Acosta-Mireles, M. (2015). Understory in the composition and diversity of managed forest areas in Santa Catarina Ixtepeji, Oaxaca. Revista Chapingo serie ciencias forestales y del ambiente, 21(1), 109-121.
Magurran, A. E. (1988). Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton university press.
Maharjan, K. L. (2005). Community participation in forest resource management in Nepal. Journal of Mountain Science, 2, 32-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-005-0032-2
Marchi, E., Chung, W., Visser, R., Abbas, D., Nordfjell, T., Mederski, P. S., ... & Laschi, A. (2018). Sustainable Forest Operations (SFO): A new paradigm in a changing world and climate. Science of the Total Environment, 634, 1385-1397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.084
Margalef, R. (1958). Information theory in ecology. General Systematics, 3: 36– 71.
MFSC Nepal, 2014. Scientific Forest Management Working Procedure (2071 B.S.). Kathmandu, Nepal: Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation (MFSC).
Michael, P. (1984). Ecological methods for field and laboratory investigations.
Monserud, R. A. (2003). Evaluating forest models in a sustainable forest management context. Forest Biometry, Modelling and Information Sciences, 1(1), 35-47. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=4c41ac5094a3b4aabc1f6c82ea6dbb489d47f2c5
Nepalpress. (2021). Community forest users welcome abolition of scientific forest management program. Nepalpress. https://english.nepalpress.com/2021/01/28/community-forest-users-welcome-abolition-of-scientific-forest-management-program/#:~:text=January%2028%2C%202021%20The%20Federation%20of%20Community%20Forest,by%20scrapping%20the%20so-called%20scientific%20forest%20management%20program.
NLC. (2019). Forests Act, 2019 (2076). https://www.lawcommission.gov.np/en/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/The-Forest-Act-2019-2076.pdf
Odum, E. P., & Barrett, G. W. (1971). Fundamentals of ecology (Vol. 3, p. 5). Philadelphia: Saunders.
Paillet, Y., Bergès, L., Hjältén, J., Ódor, P., Avon, C., Bernhardt‐Römermann, M. A. R. K. U. S., & Virtanen, R. (2010). Biodiversity differences between managed and unmanaged forests: Meta‐analysis of species richness in Europe. Conservation biology, 24(1), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01399.x
Paquette, A., & Messier, C. (2010). The role of plantations in managing the world's forests in the Anthropocene. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8(1), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.1890/080116
Pielou, E. C. (1966). Species-diversity and pattern-diversity in the study of ecological succession. Journal of theoretical biology, 10(2), 370-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(66)90133-0
Poudyal, B. H., Maraseni, T., & Cockfield, G. (2019). Scientific forest management practice in Nepal: Critical reflections from stakeholders’ perspectives. Forests, 11(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11010027
Poudyal, B. H., Maraseni, T., & Cockfield, G. (2019). Scientific forest management practice in Nepal: Critical reflections from stakeholders’ perspectives. Forests, 11(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11010027
R Core Team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
Rahman, M. H., Khan, M. A. S. A., Roy, B., & Fardusi, M. J. (2011). Assessment of natural regeneration status and diversity of tree species in the biodiversity conservation areas of Northeastern Bangladesh. Journal of Forestry Research, 22, 551-559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-011-0198-0
Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52(3/4), 591-611.
Sheppard, J. P., Chamberlain, J., Agúndez, D., Bhattacharya, P., Chirwa, P. W., Gontcharov, A., ... & Mutke, S. (2020). Sustainable forest management beyond the timber-oriented status quo: transitioning to co-production of timber and non-wood forest products—a global perspective. Current Forestry Reports, 6(1), 26-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-019-00107-1
Shrestha, A., MANDAl, R. A., & Baniya, B. (2019). Effects of Irregular Shelterwood System on Regeneration Frequency and Species Richness. Agriculture and Forestry Journal, 3(2), 50-57.
Shukla, R. S., & Chandal, P. S. (2000). Plant Ecology and Soil Science (9thEdn.), Ramnagar. S. Chand and Company Limited, New Delli, India, 121-376.
Siraj, M., Zhang, K., Xiao, W., Bilal, A., Gemechu, S., Geda, K., ... & Xiaodan, L. (2018). Does participatory forest management save the remnant forest in Ethiopia?. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences, 88, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-016-0712-4
Subedi, V. R., Bhatta, K. D., Poudel, I. P., & Bhattarai, P. (2018). Application of silvicultural system, yield regulation and thinning practices in natural forests: Case study from western Terai. Banko Janakari, 92-97. https://doi.org/10.3126/banko.v27i3.20553
Teplyakov, V. K. (2011). Current trends in the Russian Far East forest sector. Forest Science and Technology, 7(3), 103-109. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2011.594603
Wardle, P., & Kaoneka, A. R. (1999). Perceptions and concepts of the importance of forests. World forests, society and environment, 43-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4746-0_4
Whitford, P. B. (1949). Distribution of woodland plants in relation to succession and clonal growth. Ecology, 30(2), 199-208. https://doi.org/10.2307/1931186
Wilson, B., & Wang, S. (1999). Sustainable forestry: the policy prescription in British Columbia. Global Concerns for Forest Resource Utilization: Sustainable Use and Management, 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6397-4_4
WWF. (2023). WHY FORESTS ARE SO IMPORTANT. https://wwf.panda.org/discover/our_focus/forests_practice/importance_forests/ Accessed on Febraury 27, 2023
Zhou, Z., Zhang, C., Zhou, W., Li, W., Chu, L., Yan, J., & Li, H. (2014). Diversity and plant growth-promoting ability of endophytic fungi from the five flower plant species collected from Yunnan, Southwest China. Journal of plant interactions, 9(1), 585-591. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2013.873959
Zobel, D. B., Jha, P. K., Behan, M. J., & Yadav, U. K. R. (1987). A practical manual for ecology. Ratna Book Distributors, Kathmandu, Nepal, 149
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Forest Research and Training Center
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
© Forest Research and Training Center
