Transtracheal ultrasonography versus endtidal capnography in rapid confirmation of endotracheal tube placement
Keywords:
General anesthesia; Airway management; Intubation; Capnography; Ultrasonography; Endotracheal tubeAbstract
Background: Prompt confirmation of proper endotracheal (ET) tube placement after intubation is imperative to averting life-threatening consequences. Waveform capnography, although the gold standard method, poses some limitations while transtracheal ultrasonography (USG) is a reliable real-time technique that has shown much promise. Existing literature on the faster method has yielded conflicting results.
Aims and Objectives: This study aims to determine the mean time taken to confirm the correct placement of the ET tube using both transtracheal USG and end-tidal capnography. A comparative assessment of the faster method will supplement patient care by helping anesthesiologists avoid accidental esophageal/endobronchial intubation and the associated morbidity.
Materials and Methods: Consenting adult patients posted for elective surgeries under general anesthesia were recruited over a period of 18 months. The time taken for confirmation of correct tube placement by both transtracheal USG and capnographic end-tidal carbon dioxide tracing was recorded. A paired samples t-test was used to compare the means (±standard deviation).
Results: The study included 112 patients aged 40.1±12 years of whom 59 (52.6%) were females. The mean time taken to confirm tube placement by USG and capnography was 35.8±9.8 s and 67.4±13.7 s, respectively, with a mean time difference of 31.6±7.8 s which was found to be statistically significant (P<0.001).
Conclusion: Transtracheal USG is the faster method to confirm the proper placement of an ET tube during intubation when compared to waveform capnography. USG is also beneficial in detecting and avoiding accidental esophageal intubations.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The journal holds copyright and publishes the work under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC license that permits use, distribution and reprduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. The journal should be recognised as the original publisher of this work.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
