Comparative evaluation of caudal epidural, interlaminar, and transforaminal epidural steroid injection in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis
Keywords:
Spinal canal stenosis; Transforaminal injection, Interlaminar; Caudal epidural injection; Oswestry disability indexAbstract
Background: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common degenerative spinal condition which is a major cause of pain and functional disability. Epidural steroid injections with or without local anesthetics have been used for the treatment of spinal pain, particularly for radicular symptoms and spinal stenosis.
Aims and Objectives: The primary objective was to compare the efficacy of the three routes in terms of improvement in pain, disability and patient satisfaction. Secondary objectives were to compare the requirement for repeat injections and side effects, if any.
Materials and Methods: In this prospective, randomized study, 90 patients with medical evaluation and pain pattern consistent with a diagnosis of LSS were randomized into three groups: Group-I (n=30) patients were administered caudal epidural steroid injection; Group-II (n=30) interlaminar epidural steroid injection; and Group-III (n=30) transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI). The primary objective was to compare the efficacy of the three routes in terms of improvement in pain, disability, and patient satisfaction. Secondary objectives were to compare the requirement for repeat injections and side effects, if any.
Results: There was a statistically significant improvement in pain score, Oswestry disability index (ODI) score, and Swiss spinal stenosis questionnaire (SSSQ) score in all groups at all study periods. (P<0.01) The pain scores and SSSQ scores were clinically and statistically significantly lower after TFESI as compared to other groups from 1 month onward after the injection at all study interval periods (P<0.01), whereas ODI scores were better from 3 months onward.
Conclusion: All three techniques provide good pain relief and improvement in disability to the patients. TFESI is better than other two techniques in terms of improvement in pain score, treatment outcome, and functional disability.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The journal holds copyright and publishes the work under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC license that permits use, distribution and reprduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. The journal should be recognised as the original publisher of this work.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
