A comparative study of intraoperative analgesic consumption and recovery profile between sevoflurane- and propofol-based general anesthesia in adults
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v14i11.56667Keywords:
Aldrete score; Anesthesia; Propofol; Recovery; SevofluraneAbstract
Background: Many researches were performed in the past to compare propofol and sevoflurane as sole anesthetics. While some studies have reported the advantages of propofol regarding better recovery profile and post-operative analgesic sparing effect, the contrast reporting does exist. Hence, there is a further need of research to explore recovery characteristics. Whether either of these two as sole anesthetics can yield any benefit regarding intraoperative analgesics consumption has not been evaluated.
Aims and Objectives: The study primarily aimed at determining total analgesic consumption in the intraoperative period (primary outcome), between those receiving either sevoflurane or propofol for induction as well as maintenance of anesthesia. In addition, intraoperative hemodynamics (heart rate and mean arterial pressure) and recovery profile were compared.
Materials and Methods: Total of 168 patients, aged 18–60 years, the American Society of Anesthesiologists’ physical status I/II, undergoing elective and emergency surgeries under general anesthesia for 2–3 h finally recruited. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either sevoflurane (group S, n=84) or propofol (group P, n=84) for both induction and maintenance. Anesthetics were titrated to achieve bispectral index (BIS) value of 60. For both the groups, additional fentanyl was considered aliquots of 25 mcg whenever the hemodynamics changes occurred despite maintaining BIS value in the above-mentioned range.
Results: The total intraoperative analgesic consumption was found comparable in both groups of patients. Induction time (38 vs. 59 s) and emergence time (8 vs. 10 s, P<0.001) were found shorter in the propofol group than in sevoflurane. Aldrete score >9 was achieved earlier with propofol compared with sevoflurane (8.5 vs. 12 min).
Conclusion: Propofol-based shows no advantage over sevoflurane in view of intraoperative consumption of analgesics and intraoperative hemodynamic stability. However, the use of propofol was associated with faster induction as well as quicker emergence from anesthesia.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The journal holds copyright and publishes the work under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC license that permits use, distribution and reprduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. The journal should be recognised as the original publisher of this work.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
