A randomized comparative study to estimate the safety and effectiveness between laryngeal mask airway supreme and I-gel in patients undergoing elective surgeries

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v14i9.52692

Keywords:

Efficacy; I-gel; Safety; Supraglottic airway devices; Supreme LMA

Abstract

Background: Supreme laryngeal mask airway (SLMA) and i-gel airway devices are second generation supraglottic airway devices (SAD) and are good alternatives to intubation during elective surgeries.

Aims and Objectives: This study was conducted with the objective of comparing the two SAD with respect to ease of insertion, number of attempts of insertion, insertion time, ease of gastric tube insertion, accompanying hemodynamic changes, incidence of adverse effects like regurgitation, lip and dental trauma, post-operative sore throat, dysphagia, and hoarseness.

Materials and Methods: This study was conducted at M.G.M. Medical College and M.Y. hospital, Indore. Eighty patients belonging to ASA class 1 or 2, with Mallampati grading 1 or 2, between age group of 18–60 years and with BMI <30 kg/m2 were selected for the study. After induction of anesthesia, one of the SAD’s (SLMA or i-gel) was inserted following randomization, and accordingly, the patients were divided into two groups of 40 each. Insertion parameters, hemodynamic, and respiratory parameters were noted. Patients were also observed for any possible complication at 1 h and 24 h postoperatively.

Results: The Two groups showed no statistically significant difference in terms of demographic characteristics, insertion parameters, hemodynamic, or respiratory parameters (P>0.05). Postoperatively, no significant complications were observed in terms of dental injury, laryngospasm. Ease of gastric tube insertion was found to be more in SLMA group than i-gel and the difference was statistically significant (P=0.0057). Incidence of sore throat after 1 h was found to be more in SLMA group than i-gel group (P=0.048).

Conclusion: There was no significant difference between SLMA and i-gel in terms of insertion characteristics and hemodynamic changes. Ease of gastric tube insertion was found to be significantly more in SLMA group than i-gel. Incidence of post-operative sore throat at 1 h was more with SLMA as compared to i-gel.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
81
PDF
159

Downloads

Published

2023-09-01

How to Cite

Kaushal Kabir, Keshav Middha, Arora KK, & Sharma, A. (2023). A randomized comparative study to estimate the safety and effectiveness between laryngeal mask airway supreme and I-gel in patients undergoing elective surgeries. Asian Journal of Medical Sciences, 14(9), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v14i9.52692

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 9 (2023)

Section

Original Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Asian Journal of Medical Sciences

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The journal holds copyright and publishes the work under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC license that permits use, distribution and reprduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. The journal should be recognised as the original publisher of this work.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).