Evaluation of laparoscopic versus open sacrocolpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse – A study from a tertiary care center

Authors

  • Senthilkumar Poovathai Assistant Professor, Department of Urology, Government Mohan Kumaramangalam Medical College and Hospital, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4062-3029
  • Rajkumar Ramakrishnan Associate Professor, Department of Urology, Government Mohan Kumaramangalam Medical College and Hospital, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7206-487X
  • Rajasekar Sundaram Assistant Professor, Department of Urology, Government Mohan Kumaramangalam Medical College and Hospital, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4314-1589
  • Sammohit Gulakavarapu Senior Resident, Department of Urology, Government Mohan Kumaramangalam Medical College and Hospital, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5002-0008
  • Gopu Rakesh Vamsi Senior Resident, Department of Urology, Government Mohan Kumaramangalam Medical College and Hospital, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2629-2262
  • Shravankumar Savadatti Senior Resident, Department of Urology, Government Mohan Kumaramangalam Medical College and Hospital, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v14i2.50567

Keywords:

Sacrocolpopexy; Laparoscopy; Pelvic organ prolapse; Sacral colpopexy; Vault prolapse

Abstract

Background: Post hysterectomy vault prolapse is a progressive herniation of the vaginal vault through the urogenital diaphragm and commonly leads to per vaginal bulge. Surgically, vault prolapse is corrected by sacrocolpopexy which can be done both as an open abdominal surgery and as a laparoscopic repair.

Aims and Objectives: This study was performed to compare the therapeutic efficacies of laparoscopic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.

Materials and Methods: This study includes 50 cases of vault prolapsed who underwent hysterectomy previously, admitted in our institution and operated during January 2021–June 2022 for a period of 18 months with both open abdominal and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. We compared the basic characteristics, duration of surgery, post-operative stay, post-operative complications, and patient satisfaction between open and laparoscopic groups.

Results: No significant difference was observed between the characteristics of the patients in the abdominal-approach group and the laparoscopic-approach group. The laparoscopic-approach group had a lower intraoperative estimated blood loss (187.8 vs. 90.3 mL, P<0.001) and a shorter operative time (148.0 vs. 115.3 min, P<0.001) than the abdominal-approach group. The complication rates of the two groups were not significantly different.

Conclusion: Our Study is favorable for the use of laparoscopic approach over open abdominal surgery for treating cases of vault prolapse for sacrocolpopexy. The less invasive method leads to less blood loss and a shorter operative time than an open approach.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
69
PDF
159

Downloads

Published

2023-02-01

How to Cite

Senthilkumar Poovathai, Rajkumar Ramakrishnan, Rajasekar Sundaram, Sammohit Gulakavarapu, Gopu Rakesh Vamsi, & Shravankumar Savadatti. (2023). Evaluation of laparoscopic versus open sacrocolpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse – A study from a tertiary care center. Asian Journal of Medical Sciences, 14(2), 122–126. https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v14i2.50567

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 2 (2023)

Section

Original Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Asian Journal of Medical Sciences

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The journal holds copyright and publishes the work under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC license that permits use, distribution and reprduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. The journal should be recognised as the original publisher of this work.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).