Comparison of performance in physiology subject assessed by short essay type questions and multiple choice questions of first year medical students

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v8i1.15977

Keywords:

Physiology assessment, SEQ, multiple choice questions, OSPE, Medical students

Abstract

Background: Assessment and evaluation in the curriculum of medical education plays an important role to enhance the learning ability of medical students and should provide the level of actual performance as well as the capacity to improve overall performance.

Aims and Objectives: In the present study, the performance of medical students in Physiology was assessed by conventional type short essay questions (SEQ) and multiple choice questions (MCQ).

Materials and Methods: This prospective (observational) study was conducted in the subject of Physiology, A total of 380 samples were taken from students enrolled for the 1st year medical curriculum in year 2013 to 2015. The subjects were divided in two groups: subjects of this group-I was assessed with two theory papers consist of short essay question (SEQ), practical exam without OSPE. The subjects of group-II were assessed their theory part only by MCQs and maximum part of practical exam by objective structured practical examination (OSPE).

Results: The theory performance was significantly higher (p<0.05) in group-II students assessed by totally MCQ based two system tests and one terminal exams as compared to conventional type (SEQ). While the marks obtained in practical was assesses by six lab leaving tests, one terminal practical exam (OSPE) was also significantly high (p<0.005) as compared to group-I. Our data showed that the performance of two problem solving tests (one long clinical case) and grant viva (oral) was significantly less in group-II(table-I).

Conclusion: The objectivity of questions prefers over short essay questions  by students as they scores well in theory as well as in practical exams , while they poorly performed in clinical exam (the assessment of higher cognitive functions). The objectivity may eliminate the subjective difference in conventional type of evaluation.

Asian Journal of Medical Sciences Vol.8(1) 2017 82-84

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
1132
PDF
1122

Downloads

Published

2017-01-03

How to Cite

Kumar, P., Ghildiyal, J., Rajpoot, R. S., & Kumar, S. (2017). Comparison of performance in physiology subject assessed by short essay type questions and multiple choice questions of first year medical students. Asian Journal of Medical Sciences, 8(1), 82–84. https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v8i1.15977

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2017)

Section

Original Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The journal holds copyright and publishes the work under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC license that permits use, distribution and reprduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. The journal should be recognised as the original publisher of this work.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).