Penetrating eye injuries in pediatric population: An epidemiological study and visual outcome

Authors

  • Kabindra Bajracharya Pediatric Ophthalmologist, Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology, Lumbini Eye Institute, Siddharthanagar-3, Bhairahawa
  • Salma KC Rai Pediatric Ophthalmologist, Lumbini Eye Institute, Siddharthanagar-3, Bhairahawa
  • Arjun Malla Bhari Pediatric Ophthalmologist, Lumbini Eye Institute, Siddharthanagar-3, Bhairahawa
  • Hari Bahadur Thapa Optometrist, Lumbini Eye Institute Siddharthanagar-3, Bhairahawa
  • Anjita Hirachan Resident of Ophthalmology, Universal College of Medical Sciences, Bhairahawa
  • Saraswati Pandey Pediatric Ophthalmologist, Lumbini Eye Institute, Siddharthanagar-3, Bhairahawa
  • Davide Borroni Resident of Ophthalmology, Riga Stradins University, Riga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v7i4.14690

Keywords:

Penetrating eye injuries, Epidemiology, Visual outcome

Abstract

Introduction: Penetrating eye injury is an important cause of visual impairment in pediatric population.

Aims and Objectives: To study the epidemiology and visual outcome of penetrating eye injuries in pediatric population presented to Lumbini Eye Institute, the tertiary eye hospital of western Nepal.

Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at the Department of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, Lumbini Eye Institute over a period of one year from June 2014 to May 2015. All patients of penetrating eye injuries up to the age of 15 years were included in the study. The demographics of the patient, cause and duration of injury were recorded. The presenting and final best corrected visual acuity, anterior and posterior segment findings were recorded in specially designed proforma.

Results: A total number of 127 children (127 eyes) presented with penetrating eye injuries during a year. The incidence of penetrating eye injury in one year was 127 out of 12927 new patients. Minimum age was 11 months, while the maximum age was 15 years with mean of 7.29 years (SD= ±3.49). Male and female patients were 99 (78%) and 28 (22%) respectively. Involvement of right eye was seen in 69 cases (54.33%) and left eye 58 (45.67%). The most common cause of injury was wooden stick in 55 cases (43.31%) followed by iron wire 12 (9.45%) and the stone 11 (8.66%). Corneal laceration was found in 102 cases (80.31%), scleral laceration in 10 (7.87%) and corneo-scleral laceration in 15 (11.81%). Seventy three percent patients were blind at the time of presentation whereas at discharge 37.63% were blind and 11.43% of patients had visual acuity better than 6/18 at presentation whereas 35.48% had visual acuity better than 6/18 after treatment.

Conclusion: Penetrating eye injury is one of the common causes attending Pediatric Ophthalmology Department. Penetrating eye injury is common in male and majority of trauma is caused by wooden stick. The awareness of ocular trauma and its consequences should be increased to reduce incidence of childhood blindness.

Asian Journal of Medical Sciences Vol.7(4) 2016 84-87

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
1083
PDF
868

Downloads

Published

2016-07-04

How to Cite

Bajracharya, K., Rai, S. K., Bhari, A. M., Thapa, H. B., Hirachan, A., Pandey, S., & Borroni, D. (2016). Penetrating eye injuries in pediatric population: An epidemiological study and visual outcome. Asian Journal of Medical Sciences, 7(4), 84–87. https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v7i4.14690

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 4 (2016)

Section

Original Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The journal holds copyright and publishes the work under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC license that permits use, distribution and reprduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. The journal should be recognised as the original publisher of this work.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).