Triphala - An Indigenous Ayurvedic Mouthwash As An Anti-Inflammatory Agent - A Clinical Study

Authors

  • Shibam Chatterjee Pacific Dental College and Hospital, Debari, Udaipur, India
  • Balaji Manohar Pacific Dental College and Hospital, Debari, Udaipur, India
  • Neema Shetty Pacific Dental College and Hospital, Debari, Udaipur, India
  • Aditi Mathur Pacif
  • Barkha Makhijani Pacific Dental College and Hospital, Debari, Udaipur, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/jnspoi.v1i2.23551

Keywords:

Chlorhexidine gluconate, plaque, triphala

Abstract

Background: An antiplaque agent with minimal side effects that can be used as an effective adjunct to mechanical plaque control is needed. Mouthwash has been used for centuries for medicinal and cosmetic purposes, but in recent years, the rationale behind the use of chemical ingredients has been subjected to scientific research and clinical trials. Herbal medicines are in great demand in the developed as well as in developing countries for primary health care because of their wide biological and medicinal activities, higher safety margin, and lower costs. Triphala mouthwash used in Ayurveda since ancient times, is well-known for its anti-plaque, anti-gingivitis and anti-microbial properties.

Aim: To evaluate and compare the effects of an indigenously prepared 0.6% triphala mouthwash on dental plaque and gingival inflammation with a commercially available chlorhexidine mouthwash.

Materials and Methods: 20 subjects in the age group of 20-40 years with mild to moderate gingivitis were selected and divided into two equal groups in the study. Following oral prophylaxis, Group I (n=10) subjects were instructed to rinse with 10 ml of 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash, Group II (n=10) subjects with 10 ml of 0.6% triphala mouthwash twice daily for 14 days. Oral Hygiene Index-Simplified, Turesky- Gilmore-Glickman modification of Quigley-Hein-Plaque index and Gingival Index were recorded at baseline, 7 and 14 days respectively.

Results: Group I and Group II subjects showed statistically significant results in the reduction of the clinical parameters (p < 0.001). Group I subjects showed statistically significant results in reduction of the plaque status (p < 0.05) whereas; Group II subjects showed significant reduction in the gingival inflammation (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Although, 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash yielded better results, 0.6%Triphala mouthwash may be used for short duration of time without any potential side-effects as an alternative to chlorhexidine mouthwash in reducing gingival inflammation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
474
PDF
452

Author Biographies

Shibam Chatterjee, Pacific Dental College and Hospital, Debari, Udaipur, India

Department of Periodontics

Balaji Manohar, Pacific Dental College and Hospital, Debari, Udaipur, India

Departent of Periodontics

Neema Shetty, Pacific Dental College and Hospital, Debari, Udaipur, India

Department of Periodontics

Aditi Mathur, Pacif

Department of Periodontology

Barkha Makhijani, Pacific Dental College and Hospital, Debari, Udaipur, India

Department of Periodontics

Downloads

Published

2017-12-04

How to Cite

Chatterjee, S., Manohar, B., Shetty, N., Mathur, A., & Makhijani, B. (2017). Triphala - An Indigenous Ayurvedic Mouthwash As An Anti-Inflammatory Agent - A Clinical Study. Journal of Nepalese Society of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, 1(2), 60–64. https://doi.org/10.3126/jnspoi.v1i2.23551

Issue

Section

Articles