Types of plagiarism and how to avoid misconduct: Pros and cons of plagiarism detection tools in research writing and publication

Authors

  • Jay N Shah Prof. Surgery, Patan Hospital, School of Medicine, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal
  • Jenifei Shah Resident, Rujin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China;
  • Gehanath Baral Prof. Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nobel Medical College, Biratnagar, Nepal
  • Reetu Baral Department of Pathology, Nobel Medical College, Biratnagar, Nepal.
  • Jesifei Shah Intern, Rujin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Keywords:

misconduct, plagiarism types and tool, research writing publication, software

Abstract

The ultimate journey of research and writing is publication. To see one’s name listed in the author's byline is an exciting feeling. This exciting feeling of authorship credit is linked with responsibility. The impact of the published work will depend on the dissemination of evidence-based scientific findings to help the health care workers, scientists, and policymakers for the benefit of society. This requires ethical research, to begin with, and publication without misconduct to maintain the integrity and trust in science. Among various misconducts in research writing and publication, plagiarism is serious scientific misconduct. The issue of plagiarism is a global concern that requires a collective effort from all stakeholders to prevent it and take prompt action if this issue does arise. Adequate teaching and training are necessary to increase awareness right from the early phases of learning; and to develop a culture of ethical research, writing, and publication. Types of plagiarism and its characteristics vary and should be dealt with accordingly, from a warning to definitive punishment for the offense committed. The software available to detect and avoid plagiarism is plenty and should be used taking into consideration their accuracy, usability, and cost.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
1295
PDF
1473

Downloads

Published

2022-01-01

How to Cite

Shah, J. N. ., Shah, J., Baral, G., Baral, R. ., & Shah, J. . (2022). Types of plagiarism and how to avoid misconduct: Pros and cons of plagiarism detection tools in research writing and publication. Nepal Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 16(2), 3–18. Retrieved from https://nepjol.info./index.php/NJOG/article/view/42085

Issue

Section

Review