A Comparative Study on Evaluation of “No Touch” Extubation and Standard Extubation Technique on Hemodynamic Parameters during Emergence from General Anesthesia

Authors

  • Rajan Basnet Lecturer, Department of Anesthesia, Manipal College of Medical Sciences
  • Gajal Lakhe Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, Manipal College of Medical Sciences
  • Suresh Pradhan Lecturer, Department of Anesthesia, Manipal College of Medical Sciences

Keywords:

Extubation; General anesthesia; No touch extubation; Standard Awake.

Abstract

Background: Extubation is a critical phase in general anesthesia that can provoke hemodynamic instability and airway-related complications. The "no touch" extubation technique aims to minimize stimulation during emergence, potentially reducing adverse events such as coughing, laryngospasm, and hypertension. This study compares the hemodynamic and airway outcomes of "no touch" extubation with standard awake extubation.

Methods: A prospective, randomized study was conducted on 60 ASA I-II patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: Group A (standard awake extubation) and Group B (no touch extubation). Hemodynamic parameters (heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure) were recorded at baseline and at intervals post-extubation. Airway complications, including coughing, laryngospasm, and hoarseness, were also assessed. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 21, with significance set at P<0.05.

Results: The mean duration from surgery completion to spontaneous eye opening was 13.50 ± 2.66 minutes in Group A and 12.73 ± 3.00 minutes in Group B (p = 0.30). Hemodynamic responses showed a significant reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) in Group B compared to Group A (p < 0.05), while no significant differences were observed in heart rate or diastolic blood pressure. Airway complications were significantly lower in the "no touch" group, with fewer cases of coughing (24% in Group B vs. 37% in Group A), and no instances of laryngospasm in Group B. Hoarseness was also less frequent in Group B (7% vs. 17%).

Conclusions: The "no touch" extubation technique results in a more stable hemodynamic profile and fewer airway-related complications than standard awake extubation, making it a safer alternative, particularly for patients at risk of hemodynamic instability and airway reactivity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
0
pdf
0

Downloads

Published

2025-04-22

How to Cite

Basnet, R., Lakhe, G., & Pradhan, S. (2025). A Comparative Study on Evaluation of “No Touch” Extubation and Standard Extubation Technique on Hemodynamic Parameters during Emergence from General Anesthesia. Nepal Journal of Medical Sciences, 10(1). Retrieved from https://nepjol.info./index.php/NJMS/article/view/77642

Issue

Section

Original Articles