Efficacy and Safety of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor Compared to Sulphonylurea in Type II Diabetes Patients Inadequately Controlled with Metformin Alone

Authors

  • Anjan Palikhey Universal College of Medical Sciences
  • Manoj Karki Universal College of Medical Sciences
  • Jharana Shrestha Universal College of Medical Sciences
  • Laxmi Shrestha Universal College of Medical Sciences
  • Amit Kumar Shrivastava Universal College of Medical Sciences
  • Chandrajeet Kumar Yadav Universal College of Medical Sciences
  • Bidhata Rayamajhi Universal College of Medical Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/jucms.v10i01.47228

Keywords:

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, Efficiacy, Metformin, Type 2 DM

Abstract

INTRODUCTION
Diabetes is a metabolic disorder marked by high blood glucose levels, and treatment often requires multiple drugs to achieve adequate glycemic control. In individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus who do not respond to Metformin, doctors may prescribe a Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 inhibitor or a Sulphonylurea as potential add-on therapy. The study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of the Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 inhibitor with Sulphonylurea.

MATERIAL AND METHODS
This was an interventional, comparative study involving 100 type 2 diabetic patients who visited the Medicine department at Universal college of Medical Sciences. All the eligible patients were randomly divided into two treatment groups (50 each): Group A (Sulphonylurea + Metformin) and Group B (Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 inhibitor + Metformin). Treatment was provided for 18 weeks, and patients were investigated for blood glucose parameters like glycosylated hemoglobin, fasting blood glucose, postprandial glucose at baseline and after 18 weeks of follow-up, and questions regarding adverse reactions. The efficacy of the drugs between the two treatment groups was compared using an independent t-test.

RESULTS
Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 inhibitor plus Metformin was found to be superior to Sulphonylurea plus Metformin in terms of HbA1c-lowering efficacy (p=0.030). A total of 26% of patients in the Sulphonylurea group reported unpleasant hypoglycemic events, compared to 6% in the Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 inhibitor group (p=0.006). Patients treated with Sulphonylurea gained weight over 18 weeks, but those on Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 inhibitor lost weight (p=0.043).

CONCLUSION
Compared to Sulphonylurea, adding a Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 inhibitor to a Metformin therapy significantly improves glycaemic control in type 2 diabetic patients who are not well controlled with Metformin monotherapy, without producing hypoglycemia or weight gain.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
142
PDF
172

Author Biographies

Anjan Palikhey, Universal College of Medical Sciences

Department of Pharmacology

Manoj Karki , Universal College of Medical Sciences

Department of Medicine

Jharana Shrestha, Universal College of Medical Sciences

Department of Biochemistry

Laxmi Shrestha, Universal College of Medical Sciences

Department of Pharmacology

Amit Kumar Shrivastava, Universal College of Medical Sciences

Department of Pharmacology

Chandrajeet Kumar Yadav, Universal College of Medical Sciences

Department of Pharmacology

Bidhata Rayamajhi, Universal College of Medical Sciences

Department of Medicine

 

Downloads

Published

2022-08-09

How to Cite

Palikhey, A., Karki , M., Shrestha, J., Shrestha, L., Shrivastava, A. K., Yadav, C. K., & Rayamajhi, B. (2022). Efficacy and Safety of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor Compared to Sulphonylurea in Type II Diabetes Patients Inadequately Controlled with Metformin Alone. Journal of Universal College of Medical Sciences, 10(01), 40–44. https://doi.org/10.3126/jucms.v10i01.47228

Issue

Section

Original Articles