Closed Reduction and Cast Versus Percutaneous Pinning in Distal Radius Fracture

Authors

  • Bipan Shrestha Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Universal College of Medical Sciences
  • A Pandey Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Universal College of Medical Sciences
  • G P Singh Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Universal College of Medical Sciences
  • K M Shrestha Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Universal College of Medical Sciences
  • R Shrestha Department of Community Medicine, Universal College of Medical Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/jucms.v5i1.19046

Keywords:

Proximal humerus fracture, humerus shaft fracture, closed reduction, external fixation, Joshi External stabilisation system (JESS), Lacerated wound, Skin grafting

Abstract

BACKGROUND:There is much debate regarding the optimal treatment of displaced distal radius fracture. The purpose of this prospective study was to compare functional and radiological outcomes of displaced distal radial fracture treated with cast or percutaneous pin.

MATERIALS & METHODS: Sixty patients of all age groups with non comminuted extra-articular and partially articular fracture of the distal radius were included in this study. After randomization, thirty patients were treated with cast and thirty patients with percutaneous pins. For pin group below elbow volar slab was applied for three weeks. After three weeks, slab was removed and wrist physiotherapy started. Depending on radiological and clinical union, cast or pin was removed at around six to eight weeks. Follow-up was conducted at 1 week, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 9 weeks, 3 months and 6 months. Radiographic assessment was done at each visit, while functional scores were obtained at 6 weeks, 9 weeks, 3 months and 6 months. Outcomes at fixed time points were compared between two groups with standard statistical methods.

RESULTS: Mean age group in pin and cast group was 27 and 42 years respectively. Other than age, both the groups were identical with respect to sex, side and dominance of hand. Overall Pin group had better functional and radiological outcome than cast group. Pin group also had better Satio grading (p 0.002) where 96.6% of cases had excellent to good result unlike cast group where only 76.7% of cases achieved these result. Complication rate also were higher in cast group especially radial collapse (p <0.001) and malunion (p 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous pinning with immobilization in volar slab in neutral position for 3 weeks has better radiological and functional outcome than cast in the treatment of non comminuted extra-articular and partially articular distal radius fracture. Moreover percutaneous pinning is a simple and safe procedure.

Journal of Universal College of Medical Sciences (2017) Vol.05 No.01 Issue 15, Page: 1-7

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
782
PDF
779

Author Biographies

Bipan Shrestha, Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Universal College of Medical Sciences

Lecturer

A Pandey, Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Universal College of Medical Sciences

Associate Professor

G P Singh, Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Universal College of Medical Sciences

Professor

K M Shrestha, Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Universal College of Medical Sciences

Lecturer

R Shrestha, Department of Community Medicine, Universal College of Medical Sciences

Lecturer

Downloads

Published

2018-01-21

How to Cite

Shrestha, B., Pandey, A., Singh, G. P., Shrestha, K. M., & Shrestha, R. (2018). Closed Reduction and Cast Versus Percutaneous Pinning in Distal Radius Fracture. Journal of Universal College of Medical Sciences, 5(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3126/jucms.v5i1.19046

Issue

Section

Original Articles