Are we practising defensive medicine: a cure that is costlier than the disease?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3126/jpahs.v2i2.20322Keywords:
Defensive medicine, Litigation, Medical malpracticeAbstract
Introductions: In the current scenario where intimidation and manhandling to health personnel and vandalism in the hospital is high, sense of insecurity among the newer lot of surgeons and methods they incorporate to combat the possible threat from the patients or their peers has not been validated properly yet.
Methods: A preformed questionnaire with ten yes or no answers was circulated manually or via emails among the surgical residents and surgeons of less than 5 year experience. More number of 'yes' answers was considered as high level of sense of insecurity.
Results: Majority (n= 45, 90%) of respondents had 5 or more than 5 'yes' answers in the questionnaire and median 'yes' answer in the questionnaire was 8, indicating high level of insecurity among the respondents. All respondents (100%) expect themselves to be intimidated or sued in their career and 60 percent of respondents admit themselves ordering more tests than required to be on the 'safe' side.
Conclusions: This study has showed both sense of insecurity and subjective prevalence of defensive medicine among the newer lot of surgeons are high.
Journal of Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2015, page: 3-6
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
© Journal of Patan Academy of Health Sciences
Submission of the manuscript means that the authors agree to assign exclusive copyright to JPAHS. All authors must sign a Copyright Transfer and Author Agreement form upon submission of the manuscript to the Journal. The work shall not be published elsewhere in any language without the written consent of JPAHS. The articles published in this journal are protected by copyright which covers translation rights and the exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute all of the articles printed in the journal.