Comparison of Plasma Dynamics in Plasma Focus Devices PF1000 and PF400

Authors

  • Amir Shakya Central Department of Physics, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu
  • Prakash Gautam Central Department of Physics, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu
  • Raju Khanal Central Department of Physics, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/jnphyssoc.v3i1.14443

Keywords:

Plasma focus, Lee model code, Total current waveform, Peak current, Pinch current, Neutron yield

Abstract

In this work we have simulated two different sizes of plasma focus devices: PF400, a small sub-kJ plasma focus device in operation at the Atomic Energy Commission in Chile and PF1000, a 1 MJ device at the International Centre for Dense Magnetised Plasmas (ICDMP) in Warsaw, Poland. Our aim is to compare the plasma dynamics observed in two different sizes of the devices. We compare the experimentally obtained data with the data predicted from our numerical experiments using the Lee model code. It has been observed that the peak current of the total current waveform, pinch current calculated from total current, and neutron yield agree reasonably well with published experimental data, however, slight differences are found in other parameters.

Journal of Nepal Physical Society Vol.3(1) 2015: 55-59

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
990
PDF
852

Downloads

Published

2016-01-28

How to Cite

Shakya, A., Gautam, P., & Khanal, R. (2016). Comparison of Plasma Dynamics in Plasma Focus Devices PF1000 and PF400. Journal of Nepal Physical Society, 3(1), 55–59. https://doi.org/10.3126/jnphyssoc.v3i1.14443

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2015)

Section

Articles

License

All right reserved. No part of this Journal may be reproduced in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means, including information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher, except by a reviewer who may quote brief passage in a review. The views and interpretation in this journal are those of author(s) and they are not attributable to the NPS.