Comparative Evaluation of Effectiveness of Intravenous Paracetamol and Intravenous Diclofenac as Post-operative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Authors

  • Kalpana Kharbuja Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences, Dhulikhel, Nepal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6127-5556
  • Mahesh Sharma Lumbini Medical College Teaching Hospital, Palpa, Nepal
  • Nil Raj Sharma Lumbini Medical College Teaching Hospital, Palpa, Nepal

Keywords:

Diclofenac, Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, paracetamol, post-operative analgesia, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

Abstract

Introduction: Though the development of minimally invasive surgery  has revolutionized the field of surgery,  post-operative pain is still a significant issue. Unlike in the past, concerns about adverse effects have limited the role of opioids in post-operative pain management. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of intravenous paracetamol and  diclofenac as postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Methods: One hundred and twenty eight patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) categories I and II  included in this study  were divided into two groups. Anesthesia induction and maintenance were standardized. The first group received 15mg/kg (maximum 1gm) intravenous paracetamol and the second group received 2mg/kg (maximum 75mg) intravenous diclofenac 30 minutes prior to ending of surgery. A questionnaire was responded by patients and chart was maintained by visual analogue scale. Mann Whitney U test was used to analyze quantitative data and Chi-square test for categorical data. P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results:  Profiles of hemodynamic changes were almost similar in both groups with respect to heart rate and blood pressure. However, paracetamol infusion provided hemodynamic stability in post-operative period. We observed statistically significant differences  in visual analogue scale between the two groups. Most of the patients in paracetamol group had low mean pain scores in post-operative period and provided an extended analgesia compared to diclofenac. No serious postoperative complication was observed in  paracetamol group.

Conclusion: Administration of intravenous paracetamol has better and prolonged analgesic effect  with low mean pain score and less requirement for rescue analgesia compared to diclofenac.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22502/jlmc.v6i2.248

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
1123
PDF
320

Author Biographies

Kalpana Kharbuja, Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences, Dhulikhel, Nepal

Lecturer, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care

Mahesh Sharma, Lumbini Medical College Teaching Hospital, Palpa, Nepal

Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care

Nil Raj Sharma, Lumbini Medical College Teaching Hospital, Palpa, Nepal

Professor and Head, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care

Downloads

Published

2018-11-03

How to Cite

Kharbuja, K., Sharma, M., & Sharma, N. R. (2018). Comparative Evaluation of Effectiveness of Intravenous Paracetamol and Intravenous Diclofenac as Post-operative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Journal of Lumbini Medical College, 6(2). Retrieved from https://nepjol.info./index.php/JLMC/article/view/23657

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 2 (2018)

Section

Original Research Articles

License

The Journal of Lumbini Medical College (JLMC) publishes open access articles under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution(CC BY) License which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

JLMC requires an exclusive licence allowing to publish the article in print and online.

The corresponding author should read and agree to the following statement before submission of the manuscript for publication,

License agreement
In submitting an article to Journal of Lumbini Medical College (JLMC) I certify that:

  1. I am authorized by my co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  2. I warrant, on behalf of myself and my co-authors, that:
    • the article is original, has not been formally published in any other peer-reviewed journal, is not under consideration by any other journal and does not infringe any existing copyright or any other third party rights;
    • I am/we are the sole author(s) of the article and have full authority to enter into this agreement and in granting rights to JLMC are not in breach of any other obligation;
    • the article contains nothing that is unlawful, libellous, or which would, if published, constitute a breach of contract or of confidence or of commitment given to secrecy;
    • I/we have taken due care to ensure the integrity of the article. To my/our - and currently accepted scientific - knowledge all statements contained in it purporting to be facts are true and any formula or instruction contained in the article will not, if followed accurately, cause any injury, illness or damage to the user.
  3. I, and all co-authors, agree that the article, if editorially accepted for publication, shall be licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0. If the law requires that the article be published in the public domain, I/we will notify JLMC at the time of submission, and in such cases the article shall be released under the Creative Commons 1.0 Public Domain Dedication waiver. For the avoidance of doubt it is stated that sections 1 and 2 of this license agreement shall apply and prevail regardless of whether the article is published under Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 or the Creative Commons 1.0 Public Domain Dedication waiver.
  4. I, and all co-authors, agree that, if the article is editorially accepted for publication in JLMC, data included in the article shall be made available under the Creative Commons 1.0 Public Domain Dedication waiver, unless otherwise stated. For the avoidance of doubt it is stated that sections 1, 2, and 3 of this license agreement shall apply and prevail.

Please visit Creative Commons web page for details of the terms.