Intraperitoneal Hydrocortisone plus Bupivacaine versus Bupivacaine alone for Pain Relief after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors

  • Mahesh Sharma Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Lumbini Medical College, Palpa
  • Kalpana Kharbuja Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Lumbini Medical College, Palpa
  • Nil Raj Sharma Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Lumbini Medical College, Palpa

Keywords:

Bupivacaine, Cholecystectomy, Hydrocortisone, Intraperitoneal, Pain

Abstract

Introduction: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been the gold standard in the treatment of gallstones since last decades. Beside several benefits of laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with open surgery, postoperative pain is still a frequent melancholy. Hence, pain management is utmost regarding patients' comfort. The main objective of the study was to compare the effect of intraperitoneal hydrocortisone plus bupivacaine with bupivacaine alone on pain relief following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Methods: A randomized study was conducted from December 2015 to August 2015 that included 100 patients aged 20 to 60 years of both genders who were found to have symptomatic gallstones  and  were  scheduled  for  elective  laparoscopic  cholecystectomy  at  Lumbini  Medical  College.  Patients randomly received 100 mg hydrocortisone plus 100 mg bupivacaine in 200 ml normal saline (group A) or 100 mg bupivacaine in 200 ml normal saline (group B) into the peritoneum. Post-operative abdominal and shoulder pain were evaluated using Visual Analog Score (VAS). The patients were also followed up for postoperative analgesic requirements, and recovery variables. Data were collected, tabulated and analyzed statistically using SPSS version 19.

Results: Total number of patients in this study were 100. Age and gender among both groups were comparable. VAS scores for pain was significantly lower for group A as compared to group B at 0, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours. Time of oral intake in hrs for liquids and solids was statistically significant in Group A compared to Group B. Rescue analgesic  requirement  was  also  significantly  low  in  Group A  compared  to  Group  B.  Hospital  stay  in  both  group were comparable.

Conclusion: Combination of hydrocortisone plus bupivacaine can relieve pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy better compared to bupivacaine alone when administered intraperitoneally.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22502/jlmc.v3i2.71

J. Lumbini. Med. Coll. Vol 3, No 2, July-Dec 2015. Page: 41-44

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
466
PDF
397

Downloads

Published

2016-12-07

How to Cite

Sharma, M., Kharbuja, K., & Sharma, N. R. (2016). Intraperitoneal Hydrocortisone plus Bupivacaine versus Bupivacaine alone for Pain Relief after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Lumbini Medical College, 3(2), 41–44. Retrieved from https://nepjol.info./index.php/JLMC/article/view/16129

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2015)

Section

Original Research Articles

License

The Journal of Lumbini Medical College (JLMC) publishes open access articles under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution(CC BY) License which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

JLMC requires an exclusive licence allowing to publish the article in print and online.

The corresponding author should read and agree to the following statement before submission of the manuscript for publication,

License agreement
In submitting an article to Journal of Lumbini Medical College (JLMC) I certify that:

  1. I am authorized by my co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  2. I warrant, on behalf of myself and my co-authors, that:
    • the article is original, has not been formally published in any other peer-reviewed journal, is not under consideration by any other journal and does not infringe any existing copyright or any other third party rights;
    • I am/we are the sole author(s) of the article and have full authority to enter into this agreement and in granting rights to JLMC are not in breach of any other obligation;
    • the article contains nothing that is unlawful, libellous, or which would, if published, constitute a breach of contract or of confidence or of commitment given to secrecy;
    • I/we have taken due care to ensure the integrity of the article. To my/our - and currently accepted scientific - knowledge all statements contained in it purporting to be facts are true and any formula or instruction contained in the article will not, if followed accurately, cause any injury, illness or damage to the user.
  3. I, and all co-authors, agree that the article, if editorially accepted for publication, shall be licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0. If the law requires that the article be published in the public domain, I/we will notify JLMC at the time of submission, and in such cases the article shall be released under the Creative Commons 1.0 Public Domain Dedication waiver. For the avoidance of doubt it is stated that sections 1 and 2 of this license agreement shall apply and prevail regardless of whether the article is published under Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 or the Creative Commons 1.0 Public Domain Dedication waiver.
  4. I, and all co-authors, agree that, if the article is editorially accepted for publication in JLMC, data included in the article shall be made available under the Creative Commons 1.0 Public Domain Dedication waiver, unless otherwise stated. For the avoidance of doubt it is stated that sections 1, 2, and 3 of this license agreement shall apply and prevail.

Please visit Creative Commons web page for details of the terms.