Assessment of rational use of drugs using World Health Organisation’s indicators in a government hospital of central Nepal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3126/jkmc.v12i2.60345Keywords:
Patient care indicators, Prescribing indicators, Rational use of drugs, World Health OrganisationAbstract
Background: Irrational practice of medicines use is a serious problem of health care setting.
Objectives: The primary aim of this study was to assess rational use of drug (RUD) at a government hospital of central Nepal using World Health Organisation (WHO) core drug use indicators.
Methods: This descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted from 2022 November to December at Hetauda Hospital after ethical clearance. A total of 500 prescriptions were taken retrospectively by using systematic sampling method for prescribing indicators whereas 100 patient interviews were conducted prospectively to study patient care indicators. For facility-based indicators different departments of the selected hospital were visited to collect the data.
Results: The mean values of prescribing indicators of RUD in the surveyed hospital compared with WHO values for prescription of generics, antibiotics, and injections was found to be 6.3% (n = 119) vs.100%; 28.4% (n = 142) vs. 20-26.8%; and 1.2% (n = 6) vs. 13.4-21.1% respectively. Another discrepancy reported was regarding the mean number of drugs per prescription which was found to be more than the WHO optimal value (3.77 vs. 1.6-1.8). The average consultation time and dispensing time was found to be 5.52 ± 4.49 minutes vs. 10 minutes and 111 ± 60.2 seconds vs. more than 180 seconds, respectively as compared with WHO value.
Conclusion: According to the WHO/RUD core drug use indicators, rational medicine use is not attained in most prescribing and patient care components. It is recommended that health institutions should co-operate to promote the judicious use of medications.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright © Journal of Kathmandu Medical College
The ideas and opinions expressed by authors or articles summarized, quoted, or published in full text in this journal represent only the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of Journal of Kathmandu Medical College or the institute with which the author(s) is/are affiliated, unless so specified.
Authors convey all copyright ownership, including any and all rights incidental thereto, exclusively to JKMC, in the event that such work is published by JKMC. JKMC shall own the work, including 1) copyright; 2) the right to grant permission to republish the article in whole or in part, with or without fee; 3) the right to produce preprints or reprints and translate into languages other than English for sale or free distribution; and 4) the right to republish the work in a collection of articles in any other mechanical or electronic format.