Evaluation of clinical effectiveness of topical 0.2% glyceryl trinitrate, topical 2% diltiazem and their combination in the treatment of chronic anal fissure
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3126/jkmc.v8i3.29723Keywords:
Anal Fissure, Chemical Sphincterotomy, Constipation, Pain, Sitz bathAbstract
Background: The longitudinal tear or defect in the epithelial lining of the anal canal distal to the dentate line is called anal fissure. It is of two types: acute and chronic. The break in the cycle of pain, spasm and ischemia is essential for successful treatment of anal fissure. Among multiple non-surgical treatment approaches, the appropriate approach with good patient compliance might be the use of topical agents as chemical sphincterotomy. However, the effectiveness of these agents has not been evaluated widely.
Objectives: To evaluate clinical effectiveness of topical 0.2% glyceryl trinitrate, topical 2% diltiazem and their combination in the treatment of chronic anal fissure.
Methodology: The study was prospective comparative type including total 158 patients. Initially, they were given first line therapy followed by chemical sphincterotomy agents. The study drugs were given to 84 patients (three groups - 0.2% glyceryl trinitrate, 2% diltiazem and their combination) who were not healed after initial therapy. Patients were assessed for pain using visual analogue scale and other symptoms prior to and after two and six weeks of therapy.
Results: Complete healing rate was higher with combination (92.86%) than individual agents. The reduction of visual analog scale score within each group and between the groups in the period between before and after treatment was found to be statistically significant. Headache and hypotension were the common side effects seen during study.
Conclusion: Anal fissures can be successfully managed by chemical sphincterotomy. The topical nitrates and calcium channel blockers in combination are found to be effective choice rather than individual agents.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright © Journal of Kathmandu Medical College
The ideas and opinions expressed by authors or articles summarized, quoted, or published in full text in this journal represent only the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of Journal of Kathmandu Medical College or the institute with which the author(s) is/are affiliated, unless so specified.
Authors convey all copyright ownership, including any and all rights incidental thereto, exclusively to JKMC, in the event that such work is published by JKMC. JKMC shall own the work, including 1) copyright; 2) the right to grant permission to republish the article in whole or in part, with or without fee; 3) the right to produce preprints or reprints and translate into languages other than English for sale or free distribution; and 4) the right to republish the work in a collection of articles in any other mechanical or electronic format.